multi server discussion
an email conversation (let me know if I should delete some info):
That is so-called multi-server control panel, i think, isn't it ?
I started some basic functions to do multi-server control panel..
in multi server environment,
we will be able to control more than one server, no matter which one does what,
only, you will designate a server as: "web(apache) server", some other server as dns, some other as mysql...
I plan to do this structure in future... sometime, this si complex, and may confuse somme people, so I do this steadily and silently...
For example, currently ehcp supports multi server for mysql..
that means, you can use an external mysql server for your hosting environment...
you may even use (I hope) man mysql servers, some for a group of your customers, some for other group of customers...
go to ehcp gui->options-> advanced settings -> click on "morethanoneserver" and add a new mysql server...
Note that, this is still not tested very much... I implemented this a while ago...
I think to implement for apache and dns in future..
On Sat, Oct 10, 2009 at 3:15 AM, Jason xxx wrote:
> Sorry, I didnt see this email :)
> Well by slave servers, I mean one central control panel, and other servers
> assigned the hosting of the domain, and mysql.
> On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 2:49 AM, bvidinli wrote:
>> Thanks for your suggestions:
>> 1st one: I will think about adding username_ to db usernames and db
>> 2nd: tracking bw usage is a feature that I implement later, wanted by
>> many people; I need to find a fast and efficient way of doing that.
>> 3rd: can you explain slave servers ? mysql slave or slave hosting server?
>> On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 4:00 AM, Jason xxx wrote:
>> > Thanks, it's fixed, but i would do this to make sure this never happens
>> > again.
>> > Make all db usernames have a _(USERNAME) extension on it, as well as
>> > DB's.
>> > It would make it a lot safer. Also, one suggestion, track the bandwidth
>> > usage; total the usage up and prevent it from going over quota. Another
>> > nice
>> > feature would be slave servers. Thanks!
>> > Jason(BikCmp)
>> > On Mon, Oct 5, 2009 at 9:49 AM, bvidinli wrote: